Some of you know that I'm a military man, an Air Force vet who, while hardly an ideal airman, is proud of the work I did in calibration at Air Force bases in Japan and Montana. I happen to love fighter jets and enjoyed working with F-16s, which are sleek and beautiful to behold bot in the air and on the ground. I also have a love of the great battleships, from the American
Iowa class to the German
Bismarck and the Japanese
Yamato, the latter being the largest ever built.
And some of you may have been reading this blog long enough to know that I am not one who is squeamish about using military power if I fee there is a real threat involved. I was against the war in Iraq from the very beginning because (and to be as brief as possible) it was clear to me that it was completely unnecessary. It seems to me that the best way to defeat small bands of terrorists is by a combination of military intelligence, infiltration, and most important, setting a better example for the world so that people have no reason to become terrorists (though of course people driven insane by secular or religious propaganda will always find a reason to commit violence in the name of whatever cause). Anyway, my point is, I'm not a pacifist, never have been.
So it disturbs me a great deal when I read that Congress is threatening to
over-ride a Presidential veto and continue the production of the
F-22 Raptor, a plane even the Pentagon does not want. Now, the F-22 is also a beautiful airplane and perhaps the deadliest fighter ever made, but who exactly are we going to fight with it? Unless there are people in positions of power looking to start a major conflict, we don't need any more of these birds in the air (we have roughly a hundred or so active). And the charge that stopping production would cost jobs is ridiculous when you consider that many of the same congressmen that want to continue this boondoggle are against government spending for such things as high speed rail service.
Weaponized Keynesianism, as Rep. Frank points out.
Being a veteran, as I said, I have had some firsthand experience with wasteful military budgeting and of course defense contractors have long been bastions of corruption: easy to do when you have people howling that if we cut a single penny from defense spending that
nearly matches every other country in the world combined that the bad guys are gonna come over and rape your daughters or blow up your local Wal-Mart or whetever.
And once more I am at a loss to say what we can do about it. There's a lot of money involved here and the people who control it have no compunctions about killing anyone who gets in their way. Even, perhaps, Presidents. It's quite possible (though I am not making any claims) that President Kennedy was killed because he was intending to scale down the war in VietNam. All I know is, whatever the motives and morals of our soldiers and their commanders, the more weapons we have out there, the more people will feel inclined to use them. And being the biggest bully on the block just makes you a target.